Science and Politics Between Domesticated and Radicalized Pragmatism

Science in Context 10 (1):85-96 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The ArgumentThis paper introduces a distinction between two understandings of the pragmatic tradition: domesticated and radicalized pragmatism. The main difference between these two views concerns the feasibility and moral legitimacy of a radical critique of an existing practice such as science, politics, and so on. It is argued that domesticated pragmatism, with its emphasis on local rather than global perspective, has led to trivialization and degeneration of self-reflective critique. Without rejecting pragmatism as such, this paper urges a reinterpretation of this tradition so as to make room for more thorough forms of critique of both science and social practice.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,346

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Progressive Alternative: Unger versus Žižek.Lenart Škof - 2010 - Synthesis Philosophica 25 (1):93-100.
Rorty on Science and Politics.Alexander Kremer - 2009 - Human Affairs 19 (1):68-77.
The Self Awakened: Pragmatism Unbound.Roberto Mangabeira Unger - 2008 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 29 (3):315-318.
Toward an ethics of the domesticated environment.Roger J. H. King - 2003 - Philosophy and Geography 6 (1):3 – 14.
The limits of ottoman pragmatism.Murat Dağli - 2013 - History and Theory 52 (2):194-213.


Added to PP

16 (#669,746)

6 months
1 (#450,993)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references