Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (1):37-47 (2015)

Authors
Suzanne Uniacke
Charles Sturt University
Abstract
The paper’s central focus is the ‘duty’ theory of punishment developed by Victor Tadros in The Ends of Harm. In evaluating the ‘duty’ theory we might ask two broad closely related questions: whether in its own terms the ‘duty’ theory provides a justification of the imposition of hard treatment or suffering on an offender; and whether the ‘duty’ theory can provide a justification of punishment. This paper is principally concerned with the second question, which stems from a significant difference between Tadros’s ‘duty view’ of punishment, as opposed to more familiar theories that seek to justify punishment as essentially the imposition of a penalty for wrongdoing. In addressing this question I highlight this particular difference as problematic for Tadros’s ‘duty’ theory. The issues concern Tadros’s conception of punishment and the central features of his ‘duty view’: the claim that punishment of some offenders can be justified as the fulfilment of a duty of protection that they owe principally to those whom they have wrongfully harmed
Keywords Punishment  Duty  Justification  Penalty  Wrongful harm  Deterrence  Defence  Protection  Prevention
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11572-013-9215-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,025
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Punishment and the Duties of Offenders.R. A. Duff - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (1):109-127.
Retributivism In Extremis.Douglas Husak - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (1):3-31.
A Deterrence Theory of Punishment.Anthony Ellis - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):337–351.
Mercy, Retributivism, and Harsh Punishment.Stephen Kershnar - 2000 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):209-224.
Desert, Justice and Capital Punishment.Patrick Lenta & Douglas Farland - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):273-290.
Punishment: Consequentialism.David Wood - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (6):455-469.
Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2012 - Routledge.
The Irrevocability of Capital Punishment.Benjamin S. Yost - 2011 - Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (3):321-340.
Responses.Victor Tadros - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (2-3):241-325.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-03-19

Total views
39 ( #269,832 of 2,439,609 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,107 of 2,439,609 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes