- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Why is revenge wrong?
Journal of Value Inquiry 34 (1):61-69 (2000)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
On the metatheory of Field's `Solving the paradoxes, escaping revenge'.Hannes Leitgeb - 2007 - In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press.
Burali-Forti's revenge.Stewart Shapiro - 2007 - In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press.
Revenge and context.Keith Simmons - 2007 - In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press.
Field on revenge.Agustin Rayo & Philip Welch - 2007 - In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press.
Bradwardine's revenge.Stephen Read - 2007 - In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press.
Prolegomenon to future revenge.J. C. Beall - 2007 - In Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press. pp. 1–30.
Reducing revenge to discomfort.Tim Maudlin - 2007 - In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press.
Revenge, Field, and ZF.Graham Priest - 2007 - In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press. pp. 225.
Embracing revenge: on the indefinite extendibility of language.Roy T. Cook - 2007 - In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press. pp. 31.
Respect for just revenge.Brian Rosebury - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (2):451-471.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
116 (#150,816)
6 months
9 (#295,075)
2009-01-28
Downloads
116 (#150,816)
6 months
9 (#295,075)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness.Michael E. McCullough, Robert Kurzban & Benjamin A. Tabak - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):1-15.
Vengeance is self-focused: Comparing vengeful to anger-driven responses.Maartje Elshout, Rob M. A. Nelissen & Ilja van Beest - 2015 - Cognition and Emotion 29 (7):1239-1255.
What Do Online Complainers Want? An Examination of the Justice Motivations and the Moral Implications of Vigilante and Reparation Schemas.Yany Grégoire, Renaud Legoux, Thomas M. Tripp, Marie-Louise Radanielina-Hita, Jeffrey Joireman & Jeffrey D. Rotman - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 160 (1):167-188.
Conceptualising humiliation.Maartje Elshout, Rob M. A. Nelissen & Ilja van Beest - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 31 (8):1581-1594.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo