Aristotle, Heidegger, and the Megarians

Revue Roumaine de Philosophie 64 (1):125-140 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines Aristotle’s analysis of unenacted capacities to show the role they play in his discovery of the concept of actuality. I first argue that Aristotle begins Metaphysics IX by focusing on active and passive capacities, after which I discuss Aristotle’s confrontation with the Megarians, the philosophers who maintain that a capacity is present only insofar as it is being enacted. Using Heidegger’s interpretation as a guide, I show that Aristotle’s rejection of the Megarian position leads him to propose that presence cannot be confined to activity. I also argue that this provides the context for Aristotle to realize that the relation between capacity and activity can be generalized as the relation between two ways of being.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-15

Downloads
1,609 (#9,142)

6 months
210 (#13,228)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hikmet Unlu
Hacettepe University

Citations of this work

Dynamis and Energeia in Aristotle's Metaphysics.Hikmet Unlu - 2021 - European Journal of Philosophy 30 (1):17-31.

Add more citations