Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (1):41-45 (1996)

Nick Unwin
Lancaster University
The issue of mandatory cycle helmets is highly contentious. The aim of this paper is not to argue for or against legislation but to suggest criteria on which the debate should focus. This is done by attempting to answer the question: 'What criteria must be met before cycle helmet wearing is enforced?' Consideration is given to principles, precedents and consequences and four criteria are suggested. The criteria are to do with effectiveness, personal liberty, public acceptability and the promotion of the public health benefits of cycling
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.22.1.41
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,374
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Why is Preventive Medicine Exempted From Ethical Constraints?P. Skrabanek - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (4):187-190.
John Stuart Mill's "On Liberty".John C. Rees & G. L. Williams - 1988 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 42 (4):704-706.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Liberty or Death; Don't Tread on Me.Carwyn Hooper & John Spicer - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (6):338-341.
The Moral Controversy Over Boxing Reform.C. D. Herrera - 2002 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 29 (2):163-173.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
105 ( #96,234 of 2,420,330 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,912 of 2,420,330 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes