Why the God debaters are wrong – probably

The Philosophers' Magazine 37 (37):50-53 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Wallace's 'on making actions morally wrong'.Richard Swinburne - 1976 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (3):551 - 552.
God Laughs: And Other Surprising Things You Never Knew About Him.Elmer L. Towns - 2009 - Regal Books. Edited by Charles Billingsley.
Is It Natural to Believe In God?Mark R. Talbot - 1989 - Faith and Philosophy 6 (2):155-171.
Another Step in Divine Command Dialectics.Alexander R. Pruss - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (4):432-439.
Divine Commands and Arbitrariness.Paul Rooney - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (2):149 - 165.
God or Blind Nature? Philosophers Debate the Evidence.Paul Draper - 2008 - Internet Infidels (Online Publisher).
What is God like?Marie-Agnès Gaudrat - 1992 - Collegeville, Minn.: Liturgical Press. Edited by Ulises Wensell.
The god who hates lies: confronting & rethinking Jewish tradition.David Hartman - 2011 - Woodstock, VT: Jewish Lights. Edited by Charlie Buckholtz.
God?: a debate between a Christian and an atheist.William Lane Craig - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
48 (#321,780)

6 months
1 (#1,520,257)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references