A reply to Mayo's criticisms of Urbach's "randomization and the design of experiments"

Philosophy of Science 58 (1):125-128 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mayo (1987) sought to discredit Urbach's (1985) arguments against randomization as a universal requirement in clinical and agricultural trials. The present reply rebuts Mayo's criticisms.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Randomization and the design of experiments.Peter Urbach - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (2):256-273.
The virtues of randomization.David Papineau - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):437-450.
A Bayesian Argument in Favor of Randomization.Zeno G. Swijtink - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:159-168.
Reply to Hitchcock.Peter Urbach - 1992 - Analysis 52 (2):65 - 68.
The Role of Randomization in Inference.Dennis V. Lindley - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:431 - 446.
Reply to David Papineau.Peter Urbach - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):712-715.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
255 (#82,209)

6 months
3 (#1,042,169)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Urbach
London School of Economics

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Randomization and the design of experiments.Peter Urbach - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (2):256-273.
Review. [REVIEW]Barry Gower - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):555-559.

Add more references