The Reasoner 3 (2009)

Abstract
This is the third installment of a paper which deals with comparison and evaluation of the standard slingshot argument (for the claim that all true sentences, if they refer, refer to the same object) with the doxastic formulation.
Keywords slingshot  philosophy of language  substitution
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,955
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Puzzling Pairs.Michael Nelson - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):109 - 119.
Alethic Statements Are Not Intensional.Ari Maunu - 2006 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):53-61.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-17

Total views
70 ( #140,893 of 2,403,360 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #361,463 of 2,403,360 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes