Narration in judiciary fact-finding: a probabilistic explication

Artificial Intelligence and Law 26 (4):345-376 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Legal probabilism is the view that juridical fact-finding should be modeled using Bayesian methods. One of the alternatives to it is the narration view, according to which instead we should conceptualize the process in terms of competing narrations of what happened. The goal of this paper is to develop a reconciliatory account, on which the narration view is construed from the Bayesian perspective within the framework of formal Bayesian epistemology.

Categories

Keywords

DOI

10.1007/s10506-018-9219-z

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,403

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Pre-verdict Judicial Fact-finding in Criminal Trials with Juries.Rosemary Pattenden - 2008 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29 (1):1-24.
Narrative as a Means of Creating an Identity for Ourselves and Others.Janez Vodičar - 2011 - Synthesis Philosophica 26 (1):79-91.
Giving Up Judgment Empiricism: the Bayesian Epistemology of Bertrand Russell and Grover Maxwell.James Hawthorne - 1989 - In C. Wade Savage & C. Anthony Anderson (eds.), ReReading Russell: Bertrand Russell's Metaphysics and Epistemology; Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 12. University of Minnesota Press.
Objective bayesian probabilistic logic.Jon Williamson - 2008
Probabilistic Alternatives to Bayesianism: The Case of Explanationism.Igor Douven & Jonah N. Schupbach - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Artificial intelligence and the evidentiary process: The challenges of formalism and computation. [REVIEW]Ronald J. Allen - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (2-3):99-114.
Narration in the Fiction FilmPoint of View in the Cinema: A Theory of Narration and Subjectivity in Classical Film.Charles O'Brien, David Bordwell & Edward Branigan - 1986 - Substance 15 (3):96.
Historical Narration: Foundation, Types, Reason.Jorn Rusen - 1987 - History and Theory 26 (4):87-97.
Towards a Grammar of Bayesian Coherentism.Michael Schippers - 2015 - Studia Logica 103 (5):955-984.
A Bayesian proof of a Humean principle.Donald Gillies - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):255-256.
The Probabilistic Mind: Prospects for Bayesian Cognitive Science.Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford (eds.) - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Temps et récit : un défi pour l'écriture de l'histoire. À propos d'une lecture ricœurienne de Landscape and Memory de Simon Schama.Josef Řídký - 2017 - Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 8 (1):54-66.
Keynes’s Coefficient of Dependence Revisited.Peter Brössel - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (3):521-553.
The Role of Narration and the Overcoming of the Past in Schelling’s Ages of the World.Katia Hay - 2016 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 8 (3):271-287.
Reflexion - Narration: Wege zum "Willehalm" Wolframs von Eschenbach.Christian Kiening - 1991 - de Gruyter.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-22

Downloads
48 (#278,831)

6 months
2 (#521,718)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rafal Urbaniak
University of Gdansk

Citations of this work

Analyzing the Simonshaven Case With and Without Probabilities.Bart Verheij - 2020 - Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (4):1175-1199.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Truth and probability.Frank Ramsey - 1926 - In Antony Eagle (ed.), Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings. Routledge. pp. 52-94.
La Prévision: Ses Lois Logiques, Ses Sources Subjectives.Bruno de Finetti - 1937 - Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré 17:1-68.
Studies in subjective probability.Henry Ely Kyburg - 1964 - Huntington, N.Y.: Krieger. Edited by Howard Edward Smokler.

View all 35 references / Add more references