Narration in judiciary fact-finding: a probabilistic explication
Artificial Intelligence and Law 26 (4):345-376 (2018)
Abstract
Legal probabilism is the view that juridical fact-finding should be modeled using Bayesian methods. One of the alternatives to it is the narration view, according to which instead we should conceptualize the process in terms of competing narrations of what happened. The goal of this paper is to develop a reconciliatory account, on which the narration view is construed from the Bayesian perspective within the framework of formal Bayesian epistemology.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Pre-verdict Judicial Fact-finding in Criminal Trials with Juries.Rosemary Pattenden - 2008 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29 (1):1-24.
Narrative as a Means of Creating an Identity for Ourselves and Others.Janez Vodičar - 2011 - Synthesis Philosophica 26 (1):79-91.
Giving Up Judgment Empiricism: the Bayesian Epistemology of Bertrand Russell and Grover Maxwell.James Hawthorne - 1989 - In C. Wade Savage & C. Anthony Anderson (eds.), ReReading Russell: Bertrand Russell's Metaphysics and Epistemology; Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 12. University of Minnesota Press.
Probabilistic Alternatives to Bayesianism: The Case of Explanationism.Igor Douven & Jonah N. Schupbach - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Artificial intelligence and the evidentiary process: The challenges of formalism and computation. [REVIEW]Ronald J. Allen - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (2-3):99-114.
Narration in the Fiction FilmPoint of View in the Cinema: A Theory of Narration and Subjectivity in Classical Film.Charles O'Brien, David Bordwell & Edward Branigan - 1986 - Substance 15 (3):96.
Historical Narration: Foundation, Types, Reason.Jorn Rusen - 1987 - History and Theory 26 (4):87-97.
A Bayesian proof of a Humean principle.Donald Gillies - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):255-256.
The Probabilistic Mind: Prospects for Bayesian Cognitive Science.Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford (eds.) - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Temps et récit : un défi pour l'écriture de l'histoire. À propos d'une lecture ricœurienne de Landscape and Memory de Simon Schama.Josef Řídký - 2017 - Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 8 (1):54-66.
The Role of Narration and the Overcoming of the Past in Schelling’s Ages of the World.Katia Hay - 2016 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 8 (3):271-287.
Reflexion, Narration Wege Zum "Willehalm" Wolframs von Eschenbach.Christian Kiening - 1991 - De Gruyter.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-02-22
Downloads
46 (#256,893)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
2018-02-22
Downloads
46 (#256,893)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Modelling competing legal arguments using Bayesian model comparison and averaging.Martin Neil, Norman Fenton, David Lagnado & Richard David Gill - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 27 (4):403-430.
When statistical evidence is not specific enough.Marcello Di Bello - 2021 - Synthese 199 (5-6):12251-12269.
Analyzing the Simonshaven Case With and Without Probabilities.Bart Verheij - 2020 - Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (4):1175-1199.
The reasonable doubt standard as inference to the best explanation.Hylke Jellema - 2020 - Synthese 199 (1-2):949-973.
References found in this work
Bayes or Bust?: A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory.John Earman - 1992 - Bradford.
Truth and probability.Frank Ramsey - 1926 - In Antony Eagle (ed.), Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings. Routledge. pp. 52-94.
Bayes or Bust?: A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory.John Earman - 1992 - MIT Press.
La Prévision: Ses Lois Logiques, Ses Sources Subjectives.Bruno de Finetti - 1937 - Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré 17:1-68.
