Neglected Stakeholder Perspectives in Qualitative Neural Implant Research

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (3):184-187 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Neurotechnological advancement hinges on cohesive collaboration among diverse stakeholders, all unified in improving user quality of life. However, identifying the specific individuals who should q...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,245

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Relational Take on Advisory Brain Implant Systems.Timothy Brown - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):46-47.
Structuring stakeholder e‐inclusion needs.David Wright - 2010 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 8 (2):178-205.
Consciousness and Quality of Life Research.Shepherd Joshua - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 7 (1):54-55.
The Moral Duty to Love One’s Stakeholders.Muel Kaptein - 2022 - Journal of Business Ethics 180 (2):813-827.
Further Ethical Concerns for Neurotechnological Thought Apprehension in Medicine.Nathan Stout - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):28-29.
Rethinking “Cognitive” Enhancement: The Ethical Stakes of User Perspectives.Fred B. Ketchum - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 4 (1):26-27.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-07-18

Downloads
7 (#1,619,272)

6 months
7 (#587,762)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?