Cham: Palgrave Macmillan (2020)

Authors
Alberto G. Urquidez
Bowdoin College
Abstract
What is racism? is a timely question that is hotly contested in the philosophy of race. Yet disagreement about racism’s nature does not begin in philosophy, but in the sociopolitical domain. Alberto G. Urquidez argues that philosophers of race have failed to pay sufficient attention to the practical considerations that prompt the question “What is racism?” Most theorists assume that “racism” signifies a language-independent phenomenon that needs to be “discovered” by the relevant science or “uncovered” by close scrutiny of everyday usage of this term. (Re-)Defining Racism challenges this metaphysical paradigm. Urquidez develops a Wittgenstein-inspired framework that illuminates the use of terms like “definition,” “meaning,” “explanation of meaning,” and “disagreement,” for the analysis of contested normative concepts. These elucidations reveal that providing a definition of “racism” amounts to recommending a form of moral representation—a rule for the correct use of “racism.” As definitional recommendations must be justified on pragmatic grounds, Urquidez takes as a starting point for justification the interests of racism's historical victims.
Keywords Institutional Racism  Wittgenstein  Conceptual Analysis  Disagreement  Redefining Racism  Definition  Normative Analysis  Philosophy of Language  Racial Oppression  Racism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2020
Buy this book Find it on Amazon.com
ISBN(s) 3030272567   3030272591   3030272583   9783030272562
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,481
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Racism: A Moral or Explanatory Concept? [REVIEW]César Cabezas - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (3):651-659.
Moral Responsibility for Racial Oppression. [REVIEW]Megan Mitchell - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (3):641-650.
Anti-racism and inclusive racism.Ezio Di Nucci - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (3):637-640.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Racism: What It Is and What It Isn't.Lawrence Blum - 2002 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 21 (3):203-218.
Own-Race-Absent Racism.T. Martin - 2009 - South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (1):25-33.
Xenophobia and Racism.David Haekwon Kim & Ronald Sundstrom - 2014 - Critical Philosophy of Race 2 (1).
Racism as Disrespect.Joshua Glasgow - 2009 - Ethics 120 (1):64-93.
Jorge Garcia and the Ordinary Use of "Racist Belief".Alberto G. Urquidez - 2017 - Social Theory and Practice 43 (2):223-248.
‘Heart Attack. [REVIEW]Charles W. Mills - 2003 - The Journal of Ethics 7 (1):29-62.
Conceptualizing Racism and Its Subtle Forms.Polycarp Ikuenobe - 2011 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (2):161-181.
Conceptualizing and Theorizing About the Idea of a “Post‐Racial” Era.Polycarp Ikuenobe - 2013 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43 (4):446-468.
Structural Racism, Institutional Agency, and Disrespect.Andrew J. Pierce - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Research 39:23-42.
Structural Racism, Institutional Agency, and Disrespect.Andrew J. Pierce - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Research 39:23-42.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-07-09

Total views
82 ( #129,919 of 2,446,291 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #86,858 of 2,446,291 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes