Are environmental social governance equity indices a better choice for investors? An Asian perspective

Business Ethics: A European Review 25 (4):440-459 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article examines the risk and return profiles of stock indices composed of companies meeting environmental, social and governance screening criteria [such as the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices ] and conventional composite indices of eight Asian countries from 2002 to 2014. The results indicate that there are no significant differences in the returns or risk-adjusted returns between the ESG indices and the composite indices within countries. The results do reveal that the market volatility of the ESG indices is higher than the market volatility of the conventional indices. Market betas of DJSI and ESG equity indices are significantly lower than betas of the composite equity indices. The overall results indicate that the performance of ESG equity indices of many Asian countries is similar to the performance of conventional indices, suggesting that investors can pursue socially responsible investing objectives without a material difference in portfolio performance from conventional investing.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,952

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A guided tour of minimal indices and shortest descriptions.Marcus Schaefer - 1998 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 37 (8):521-548.
Indices of theory promise.Laurie Anne Whitt - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (4):612-634.
Immunity and Hyperimmunity for Sets of Minimal Indices.Frank Stephan & Jason Teutsch - 2008 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 49 (2):107-125.


Added to PP

18 (#621,578)

6 months
3 (#247,676)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?