Review of Metaphysics 6 (3):483 - 485 (1953)

Abstract
I have admitted different kinds of power but the admission does not make it objectionable--in spite of Dr. Beardsley's point and Mr. Grünbaum's opening statement--to use the same word in order to indicate that all these kinds are under the same category--Mr. Williams' rejection of the category notwithstanding--of latent but directed tendencies or dispositions. Let my critics envisage power by analogy with, and including, the physical vector of force. i.e. as something which we represent by an arrow, to induce them to reconsider Dr. Beardsley's point and to concede that the Gestalt forces of cohesion and personal dispositions belong to the category under consideration since both are directed agencies. The directedness of power--let me add with reference to Mr. Feigl's point and to one of Mr. Krikorian's questions --enables me to account for the so-called teleological situations without assuming a metaphysics of teleology. In particular, I can mention a "feed-back" mechanism in order to give an example of the transformation of directed into directing, or controlling, power.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0034-6632
DOI revmetaph19536314
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,999
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Justice as Inherent Rights: A Response to My Commentators.Nicholas Wolterstorff - 2009 - Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (2):261-279.
Response to Comments.Konstantin Kolenda - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 10 (1):118 - 121.
Response to Comments.Donald Walhout - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 9 (4):652 - 655.
Response to Comments.Newton P. Stallknecht - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 9 (3):481 - 484.
Response to Comments.David Harrah - 1955 - Review of Metaphysics 9 (1):125 - 128.
Response to Comments.Paul Weiss - 1955 - Review of Metaphysics 8 (4):682 - 684.
Response to Comments.Richard Taylor - 1954 - Review of Metaphysics 7 (4):689 - 693.
Response to Comments.Francis V. Raab - 1952 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (1):130 - 131.
Response to Comments.Carl G. Hempel - 1952 - Review of Metaphysics 5 (4):628 - 629.
Response to Comments.James F. Anderson - 1952 - Review of Metaphysics 5 (3):469 - 472.
Comments on Russell's: An Inquiry Into Meaning and Truth.Andrew Ushenko - 1941 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2 (1):98-101.
Comments on Girardot's Response.Robert C. Neville - 1986 - Philosophy East and West 36 (3):271-273.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total views
3 ( #1,286,645 of 2,410,618 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #540,271 of 2,410,618 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes