Computational Exploration of Metaphor Comprehension Processes Using a Semantic Space Model

Cognitive Science 35 (2):251-296 (2011)

Recent metaphor research has revealed that metaphor comprehension involves both categorization and comparison processes. This finding has triggered the following central question: Which property determines the choice between these two processes for metaphor comprehension? Three competing views have been proposed to answer this question: the conventionality view (Bowdle & Gentner, 2005), aptness view (Glucksberg & Haught, 2006b), and interpretive diversity view (Utsumi, 2007); these views, respectively, argue that vehicle conventionality, metaphor aptness, and interpretive diversity determine the choice between the categorization and comparison processes. This article attempts to answer the question regarding which views are plausible by using cognitive modeling and computer simulation based on a semantic space model. In the simulation experiment, categorization and comparison processes are modeled in a semantic space constructed by latent semantic analysis. These two models receive word vectors for the constituent words of a metaphor and compute a vector for the metaphorical meaning. The resulting vectors can be evaluated according to the degree to which they mimic the human interpretation of the same metaphor; the maximum likelihood estimation determines which of the two models better explains the human interpretation. The result of the model selection is then predicted by three metaphor properties (i.e., vehicle conventionality, aptness, and interpretive diversity) to test the three views. The simulation experiment for Japanese metaphors demonstrates that both interpretive diversity and vehicle conventionality affect the choice between the two processes. On the other hand, it is found that metaphor aptness does not affect this choice. This result can be treated as computational evidence supporting the interpretive diversity and conventionality views
Keywords Maximum likelihood estimation  Latent semantic analysis (LSA)  Categorization  Cognitive modeling  Semantic space model  Interpretive diversity  Conventionality  Comparison  Metaphor comprehension
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01144.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,369
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Metaphors We Live By.George Lakoff - 1980 - University of Chicago Press.
Relevance.D. Sperber & D. Wilson - 1995 - Blackwell.
Perceptual Symbol Systems.Lawrence W. Barsalou - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):577-660.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Metaphor in Sign Languages.Irit Meir & Ariel Cohen - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
21 ( #398,395 of 2,255,273 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #1,004,425 of 2,255,273 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature