Mental Causation for Standard Dualists

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 102 (4):978-998 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The standard objection to dualist theories of mind is that they seemingly cannot account for the obvious fact that mental phenomena cause our behaviour. On the plausible assumption that all our behaviour is physically necessitated by entirely physical phenomena, there appears to be no room for dualist mental causation. Some argue that dualists can address this problem by making minimal adjustments in their ontology. I argue that no such adjustments are required. Given recent developments in philosophy of causation, it is plausible that mental phenomena cause behaviour in standard dualist ontologies.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-12

Downloads
767 (#30,660)

6 months
206 (#13,724)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bram Vaassen
Umeå University

Citations of this work

On the causal arguments for physicalism.Wenjun Zhang - 2024 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):1-11.
Against causal arguments in metaphysics.Bram Vaassen - 2024 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):1-13.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Physicalism, or Something Near Enough.Jaegwon Kim - 2005 - Princeton University Press.
Consciousness and Fundamental Reality.Philip Goff - 2017 - New York, USA: Oup Usa.
An Argument for the Identity Theory.David K. Lewis - 1966 - Journal of Philosophy 63 (1):17-25.
Mental causation.Stephen Yablo - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (2):245-280.

View all 73 references / Add more references