Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 40 (2):191-210 (2018)

Miroslav Vacura
University of Economics, Prague
Many philosophers of science have maintained that science should be value-free; still others believe that such ideal is neither achievable nor desirable for science. Hugh Lacey is presently one of the main supporters of the idea of value-free science and his theory is probably the most debated today and attracts the most attention and criticism. Therefore, in this text, I will primarily analyze his theory of value-free science. After briefly defining the notion of value I highlight which strategy Lacey chooses to lay a firm foundation for the concept of science without value, with his starting point being the differentiation between cognitive and non-cognitive values. Then I describe three basic characteristics of Lacey’s value-free science: impartiality, neutrality, and autonomy. However, the overall plan and design of his project, together with some concrete steps he takes, are not without problems in our view. I will try to point out some of these problematic issues and provide brief suggestions for alleviating them.
Keywords value-free science   impartiality   neutrality   autonomy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Values in Science.Ernan McMullin - 2012 - Zygon 47 (4):686-709.
Values in Science.Ernan McMullin - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982 (4):3-28.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Roles for Values in Scientific Activities.Hugh Lacey - 2018 - Axiomathes 28 (6):603-618.
Rehabilitating Neutrality.Hugh Lacey - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (1):77-83.
Why Science Cannot Be Value-Free.Agnieszka Lekka-Kowalik - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):33-41.
The Constitutive Values of Science.Hugh Lacey - 1997 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 1 (1):3-40.
Impartiality as a Constitutive Value of Science.Eduardo Salles O. Barra - 1997 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 1 (2):287-290.
Hugh Lacey is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding.Mary Tiles - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):953-955.
The Scope and Limits of Value-Freedom in Science.Panu Raatikainen - 2006 - In Heikki J. Koskinen Sami Pihlstrom & Risto Vilkko (eds.), Science – A Challenge to Philosophy?


Added to PP index

Total views
85 ( #126,531 of 2,448,775 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #82,869 of 2,448,775 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes