A New Kantian Solution to the Third Antinomy of Pure Reason and to the Free Will Problem

Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (4):403-431 (2009)
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to articulate a new solution to Kant’s third antinomy of pure reason, one that establishes the possibility ofincompatibilist freedom—the freedom presupposed by our traditional conceptions of moral responsibility, moral worth, and justice—without relying on the doctrine of transcendental idealism (TI). A discussion of Henry Allison’s “two-aspect” interpretation of Kant’s TI allows me both to criticize one of the best defenses of TI today and to advance my own TI-free solution to the third antinomy by appeal to a thesis of epistemic modesty based on Paul Guyer’s realist interpretation of Kant’s theory of experience. According to this interpretation, the a priori forms of our sensibility and understanding are not forms that the mind imposes on a material whose real properties are unknowable to us but are instead forms that limit or filter the kinds of things we can experience and know. In particular, being causally determined is a real feature of things as they are in themselves, but the necessity and universality of our deterministic claims are relative, restricted to the objects of possible experience. Consequently, though a causally determined event cannot be free, the necessity and universality of determinism does not entail that free events (choices) cannot exist but that they cannot constitute objects of possible experience. After arguing that freedom is possible, I outline an argument for the reality of freedom, based on therequirements of morality. Finally, I argue that my view, though opposed to metaphysical naturalism, is consistent with scientific realism and methodological naturalism
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0038-4283
DOI 10.1111/j.2041-6962.2009.tb00167.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,692
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Adorno on Kant, Freedom and Determinism.Timo Jütten - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):548-574.
Foreknowledge and Human Freedom in Augustine.Vance G. Morgan - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Research 19:223-242.
Two Standpoints and the Problem of Moral Anthropology.Patrick Frierson - 2010 - In James Krueger & Benjamin Bruxvoort Lipscomb (eds.), Kant's Moral Metaphysics. Walter Degruyter. pp. 83.
Heidegger's Concept of Human Freedom.Elif Çirakman - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 11:41-47.
In the World but Not Of the World.William S. Wilkerson - 2009 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (1):113-129.
Moral and Nonmoral Freedom in Kant.Iain Morrisson - 2007 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (1):129-148.
Review: McCarty, Kant's Theory of Action. [REVIEW]Lara Denis - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):533-535.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-14

Total downloads

45 ( #114,191 of 2,158,427 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #53,121 of 2,158,427 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums