Against Public Reason Liberalism's Accessibility Requirement

Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3):366-389 (2011)
Abstract
Public reason liberals typically defend an accessibility requirement for reasons offered in public political dialog. The accessibility requirement holds that public reasons must be amenable to criticism, evaluable by reasonable persons, and the like. Public reason liberals are therefore hostile to the public use of reasons that appear inaccessible, especially religious reasons. This hostility has provoked strong reactions from public reason liberalism's religion-friendly critics. But public reason liberals and their religion-friendly critics need not be at odds because the accessibility requirement is implausible. In fact, the accessibility requirement is ambiguous between two interpretations, one of which is too stringent and the other too loose. Depending upon the interpretation, accessibility either restricts the use of too many secular reasons or permits appeal to a wide range of religious reasons. The accessibility requirement should therefore be rejected.
Keywords PUBLIC REASON   PUBLIC REASON LIBERALISM   SECULAR REASONS   RELIGIOUS REASONS   PUBLIC JUSTIFICATION
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/174552411X588991
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,308
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
In Defence of Intelligible Reasons in Public Justification.Kevin Vallier - 2016 - Philosophical Quarterly 66 (264):596-616.
Should International Courts Use Public Reason?Silje Aambø Langvatn - 2016 - Ethics and International Affairs 30 (3):355-377.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Liberalism, Religion And Integrity.Kevin Vallier - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):149 - 165.
The Ethics of Reasoning From Conjecture.Micah Schwartzman - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (4):521-544.
The Mutability of Public Reason.Chad Flanders - 2012 - Ratio Juris 25 (2):180-205.
Reconciling Public Reason and Religious Values.James P. Sterba - 1999 - Social Theory and Practice 25 (1):1-28.
Conceptual Exclusion and Public Reason.Brandon Morgan-Olsen - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (2):213-243.
Added to PP index
2011-10-18

Total downloads
92 ( #57,266 of 2,180,120 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #68,792 of 2,180,120 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums