Canine Justice: An Associative Account

Political Studies 62 (1):37-52 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A prominent view in contemporary political theory, the ‘associative view’, says that duties of justice are triggered by particular cooperative relations between morally significant agents, and that ‘therefore’ principles of justice apply only among fellow citizens. This view has been challenged by advocates of global justice, who point to the existence of a world-wide cooperative network to which principles of justice apply. Call this the challenge from geographical extension. In this paper, I pose a structurally similar challenge to the associative view: the challenge from species extension. This says that the existing network of cooperation extends beyond the human species, to encompass some non-human animals, particularly domesticated dogs. In light of this, if one believes that (i) certain non-human animals are morally significant (i.e. objects of moral concern), and that (ii) justice applies to fellow cooperators, one should also hold that domesticated dogs are owed justice in much the same way our human fellow citizens are. I conclude by considering the implications of this argument for the associative view, and animal-rights theory.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Associative Duties and Global Justice.Jonathan Seglow - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (1):54-73.
How Association Matters for Distributive Justice.Helena de Bres - 2016 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (2):161-186.
How Association Matters for Distributive Justice.Helena de Bres - 2014 - New Content is Available for Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (2):161-186.
How Association Matters for Distributive Justice.Helena de Bres - 2016 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (2):161-186.
Coercion and Justice.Laura Valentini - 2011 - American Political Science Review 105 (1):205-220.
Justice and Beneficence.Pablo Gilabert - 2016 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 19 (5):508-533.
Responsibility and Global Justice.Mathias Risse - 2017 - Ratio Juris 30 (1):41-58.
Listening to the Avant-Garde.Rahul Rao - 2013 - Ethics and Global Politics 6 (2):101-107.
Justice, Authority, and the World Order.A. Walton - 2009 - Journal of Global Ethics 5 (3):215 – 230.
Rawlsian Justice and Non-Human Animals.Robert Elliot - 1984 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 1 (1):95-106.
Against Rawlsian Institutionalism About Justice.Brian Berkey - 2016 - Social Theory and Practice 42 (4):706-732.
Secession and Distributive Justice.Amandine Catala - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (2):529-552.
Justice and Boundaries.David Miller - 2009 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (3):291-309.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-25

Downloads
128 (#95,945)

6 months
19 (#51,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Laura Valentini
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

Citations of this work

Animal Ethics and the Political.Alasdair Cochrane, Robert Garner & Siobhan O’Sullivan - 2018 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 21 (2):261-277.
A Pluralist Account of the Basis of Moral Status.Giacomo Floris - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (6):1859-1877.
Interspecies Politics: Reply to Hinchcliffe and Ladwig.Sue Donaldson & Will Kymlicka - 2015 - Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (3):321-344.
Welcoming, Wild Animals, and Obligations to Assist.Josh Milburn - 2021 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 34 (6):1-20.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references