Journal of Applied Philosophy 37 (5):846-853 (2020)

Kevin Vallier
Bowling Green State University
I argue against Lori Watson and Christie Hartley's recent criticisms of convergence approaches to public justification. In particular, I argue that convergence approaches can capture what is distinctive about democratic decision‐making and provide an attractive account of stability for the right reasons.
Keywords public reason  public justification  liberalism  feminism  convergence
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/japp.12457
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,209
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Multicultural Citizenship.Will Kymlicka - 1995 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Consensus, Convergence, Restraint, and Religion.Paul Billingham - 2018 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 15 (3):345-361.
Equal Citizenship, Neutrality, and Democracy: A Reply to Critics of Equal Recognition.Alan Patten - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (1):127-141.
Citizenship and Justice.Andrew Mason - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (3):263-281.
Freedom, Equality, Minarets.Alexa Zellentin - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (1):45-63.
Legal Modes and Democratic Citizens in Republican Theory.Galya Benarieh Ruffer - 2013 - In Andreas Niederberger & Philipp Schink (eds.), Republican Democracy: Liberty, Law and Politics. Edinburgh University Press.
Functional Properties and Convergence in Biology.Mark B. Couch - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1041-1051.


Added to PP index

Total views
9 ( #928,286 of 2,455,350 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,290 of 2,455,350 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes