Forming an asymmetrical brain: Genes, environment, and evolutionarily stable strategies

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):615-623 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The present response elaborates and defends the main theses advanced in the target article: namely, that in order to provide an evolutionary account of brain lateralization, we should consider advantages and disadvantages associated both with the individual possession of an asymmetrical brain and with the alignment of the direction of lateralization at the population level. We explain why we believe that the hypothesis that directional lateralization evolved as an evolutionarily stable strategy may provide a better account than alternative hypotheses. We also further our discussion of the influence of stimulation and experience in early life on lateralization, and thereby show that our hypothesis is not deterministic. We also consider some novel data and ideas in support of our main thesis.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rethinking brain asymmetries in humans.Bianca Dräger, Caterina Breitenstein & Stefan Knecht - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):598-599.
The trade-off between symmetry and asymmetry.Michael C. Corballis - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):594-595.
The inapplicability of evolutionarily stable strategy to the prisoner's dilemma.Louis Marinoff - 1990 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (4):461-472.


Added to PP

39 (#410,943)

6 months
6 (#530,265)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references