Theoria 87 (1):167-186 (2021)

Authors
Abstract
I discuss a criterion for successful communication between a speaker and a hearer put forward by Buchanan according to which there is communicative success only if the hearer entertains, as a result of interpreting the speaker's utterance, a thought that has the same truth conditions as the thought asserted by the speaker and, furthermore, does so in virtue of recognizing the speaker's communicative intentions. I argue, against Buchanan, that the data on which it is based are compatible with a view involving Fregean modes of presentation. In the second part of the article I critically discuss Unnsteinsson's claim that communicative success depends on the absence of contextually salient false distinctness beliefs about the subject matter of the conversation. I argue that this thesis leads to clearly counterintuitive consequences and that no fundamental role must be given to the presence or absence of false distinctness beliefs in one's account of successful communication. The upshot is that we should stick with Buchanan's criterion. I conclude by employing Strawson and Recanati's concepts of linking and merging to show how the criterion I favour is compatible with the fact that, when subjects hold no relevant false distinctness beliefs, communicative success does not seem to be disrupted by the hearer seemingly failing to recognize the speaker's intentions.
Keywords communicative intentions  communicative success  co‐reference  singular reference
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/theo.12186
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,339
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Varieties of Reference.Louise M. Antony - 1987 - Philosophical Review 96 (2):275.
Frege's Puzzle. [REVIEW]Graeme Forbes - 1987 - Philosophical Review 96 (3):455.
The Semantics of Singular Terms.Brian Loar - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 30 (6):353 - 377.
The Edenic Theory of Reference.Elmar Unnsteinsson - 2019 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 62 (3):276-308.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Can We Not Do at Will and Why.Hagit Benbaji - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (7):1941-1961.
Obstacles To Communication, Enhancement Of Communication, Criteria For Successful Communication.Mladen Jovanovic - 1999 - Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 2 (6):41-54.
Self-Deceiving Intentions.Mike W. Martin - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):122-123.
When Beliefs Wrong.Mark Schroeder - 2018 - Philosophical Topics 46 (1):115-127.
Recognizing Communicative Intentions in Infancy.Gergely Csibra - 2010 - Mind and Language 25 (2):141-168.
Why Not LF for False Belief Reasoning?Jill G. de Villiers & Peter A. de Villiers - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):682-683.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-05-08

Total views
44 ( #242,925 of 2,448,786 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #82,723 of 2,448,786 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes