Res Publica 25 (4):487-496 (2019)

Authors
Kevin Vallier
Bowling Green State University
Abstract
This essay explores and criticizes Matteo Bonotti’s argument that parties and partisans in a publicly justified polity should appeal primarily, if not exclusively, to accessible justificatory reasons to fulfill their political duties. I argue that political parties should only support coercive policies if they rationally believe that the coercive law or policy in question can be publicly justified to those subject to the law or policy in terms of their own private—specifically intelligible—reasons. I then explore four practical differences between our two approaches. In contrast to Bonotti’s accessible reasons approach, the intelligibility approach facilitates the provision of assurance between citizens and political officials, requires that parties and partisans support fewer coercive policies, allows more exemptions from generally applicable laws, and facilitates logrolling and alliance formation.
Keywords public justification  public reason  partisanship
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-019-09436-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,077
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Political Liberalism by John Rawls. [REVIEW]Philip Pettit - 1994 - Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):215-220.
Liberalism’s Religion.Cécile Laborde (ed.) - 2017 - Harvard University Press.
The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism.Charles Larmore - 1999 - Journal of Philosophy 96 (12):599.
The Moral Basis of Religious Exemptions.Kevin Vallier - 2016 - Law and Philosophy 35 (1):1-28.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Introduction: Parties, Partisanship and Political Theory.Veit Bader & Matteo Bonotti - 2014 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (3):253-266.
In Defence of Intelligible Reasons in Public Justification.Kevin Vallier - 2016 - Philosophical Quarterly 66 (264):596-616.
In Defense of Partisanship.Neil Sinhababu - 2016 - In David Killoren, Emily Crookston & Jonathan Trerise (eds.), Ethics in Politics: New Papers on the Rights and Obligations of Political Agents. Routledge. pp. 75-90.
Why is Collective Violence Collective?Roberta Senechal de la Roche - 2001 - Sociological Theory 19 (2):126-144.
Why Is Collective Violence Collective?Roberta Senechal de La Roche - 2001 - Sociological Theory 19 (2):126 - 144.
Can Deliberative Democracy Be Partisan?Russell Muirhead - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2-3):129-157.
The Meaning of Partisanship.Jonathan White & Lea Ypi - 2016 - Oxford University Press UK.
Can Deliberative Democracy Be Partisan?Russell Muirhead - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2):129-157.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-08-07

Total views
7 ( #1,043,322 of 2,454,555 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,188 of 2,454,555 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes