Political Utopias: Contemporary Debates

New York, NY: Oup Usa (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contemporary political philosophers disagree about whether theories of justice should be utopian or realistic. Contributors to this volume largely deny that the choice between realism and idealism is binary. Their contributions represent a continuum between realism and idealism that best represents the contemporary state of the debate.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 98,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can non-ideal theories of justice guide action?Robert Talisse - 2017 - In Kevin Vallier & Michael Weber (eds.), Political Utopias: Contemporary Debates. New York, NY: Oup Usa.
The Need for Non-Ideal Theory: A Case Study in Deliberative Democracy.Danielle Wenner - 2017 - In Kevin Vallier & Michael Weber (eds.), Political Utopias: Contemporary Debates. New York, NY: Oup Usa. pp. 203-231.
Prime justice.David Estlund - 2017 - In Kevin Vallier & Michael Weber (eds.), Political Utopias: Contemporary Debates. New York, NY: Oup Usa.
Justice and feasibility : a dynamic approach.Pablo Gilabert - 2017 - In Kevin Vallier & Michael Weber (eds.), Political Utopias: Contemporary Debates. New York, NY: Oup Usa.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-06

Downloads
66 (#263,270)

6 months
5 (#933,054)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Michael Weber
Bowling Green State University
Kevin Vallier
Bowling Green State University

Citations of this work

Political realism, legitimacy, and a place for external critique.Ilaria Cozzaglio - 2021 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (10):1213-1236.
The rationality of political experimentation.Gregory Robson - 2020 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 20 (1):67-98.
The Tyranny of a Metaphor.David Wiens - 2018 - Cosmos + Taxis 5 (2):13-28.
Protecting the entrepreneurial poor: A human rights approach.Jahel Queralt - 2019 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 18 (4):336-357.
The Persistence of the Leveling Down Objection.Michael Weber - 2019 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 12 (1):1-25.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Decision Theory: Yes! Truth Conditions: No!Nate Charlow - 2016 - In Nate Charlow & Matthew Chrisman (eds.), Deontic Modality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Add more references