Supposition Theory and Porretan Theology: Summa Zwettlensis and Dialogus Ratii et Everardi

Vivarium 51 (1-4):119-144 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article investigates how the problem of reference is treated in the theology of two pupils of Gilbert of Poitiers by means of suppo* terms. Supposition is for Gilbert an action performed by a speaker, not a property of terms, and he considers language as a system for communication between human beings: key notions are the ‘sense in the author’s mind’ and the ‘interpreter’s understanding’. In contrast, the two Porretans tend to objectify language as a formal system of terms. Suppositio becomes in the Summa Zwettlensis the name itself as subject term in a proposition, and is divided into many kinds; formal rules are described which govern the influence of the predicate on the subject term’s denotation. In Everard of Ypres’ Dialogus Ratii et Everardi, supponere is a function of the name, and ‘human is a species of individuals’ is, as in some logical treatises and differently from Gilbert, a case of rhetorical transfer.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
35 (#433,400)

6 months
10 (#219,185)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Luisa Valente
Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza

Citations of this work

The Porretani on truth and propositional meaning.Enrico Donato - 2023 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 32 (1):45-64.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Humanitas.[author unknown] - 1963 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 18 (1):96-97.
Logique et théologie.M. Bombik - 1988 - Studia Philosophiae Christianae 24 (2):75-89.
On the Doctrine of Logic and Language of Gilbert Porreta and his Followers.Lauge Nielsen - 1976 - Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec Et Latin 17:40-69.

View all 9 references / Add more references