Teleology, consequentialism, and the past

Journal of Value Inquiry 22 (2):89-101 (1988)
Act teleological theories are theories that judge an action permissible just in case its outcome is maximally good.[1] It is usually assumed that act teleological theories cannot be @i, i.e., make the permissibility of actions depend on what the past was like (e.g., on what promises were made, what wrong doings were done, and more generally on what actions were performed).[2] I shall argue that this is not so. Although @u act teleological theories, such as classical act utilitarianism, are not past-regarding, there are other types of act teleological theories that are past-regarding.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00135455
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,392
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Lukas H. Meyer (2006). Reparations and Symbolic Restitution. Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (3):406–422.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

33 ( #145,596 of 1,924,703 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #254,650 of 1,924,703 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.