Philosophy Compass 14 (3):e12569 (2019)

Authors
Mercedes Valmisa
Gettysburg College
Abstract
This paper challenges the view that contentment leads to personal freedom and autonomy and argues for a relational and exercise concept of de facto freedom in the Zhuangzi 莊子. I first review influential interpretations of freedom in the Zhuangzi that equate freedom with contentment and nonfrustration, starting with Guo Xiang's 郭象 (d. 312 CE). By putting these interpretations in dialog with contemporary social philosophy (Christman, Meyers, Pettit, Elster, and Khader), I reflect on the two seminal problems of the psychologizing causal and procedural approaches that allow the interpretation of freedom as contentment: the “happy slave” problem and the “sour grapes” problem. Proving this account of freedom inadequate, I argue for a different interpretation of freedom in the Zhuangzi that resembles a weakly substantive and constitutive account of freedom and autonomy in modern‐day social philosophy terms, such as Marina Oshana's. The theory of freedom that I analyze in the Zhuangzi, however, helps us correct the risk of material determinism of the constitutive account, offering a description of relational freedom and autonomy as constituted by socio‐material conditions but not determined by them.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phc3.12569
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,209
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Rationality and Freedom.Amartya Sen - 2005 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 67 (1):182-183.
Personal Autonomy and Society.Marina A. L. Oshana - 1998 - Journal of Social Philosophy 29 (1):81-102.
Negative and Positive Freedom.Gerald C. MacCallum - 1967 - Philosophical Review 76 (3):312-334.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Self and Human Freedom in Foucault and Zhuangzi.Guoping Zhao - 2012 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 39 (1):139-156.
Zhuangzi's Notion of Transcendental Life.Eske Møllgaard - 2005 - Asian Philosophy 15 (1):1-18.
A Relational Account of Intellectual Autonomy.Benjamin Elzinga - 2019 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (1):22-47.
Nurse Autonomy as Relational.Chris MacDonald - 2002 - Nursing Ethics 9 (2):194-201.
"zhuangzi" "happy" Han's Concept Of Justice.Ping Yangzi - 1999 - Philosophy and Culture 26 (9):880-888.
The Relatively Happy Fish.Chad Hansen - 2003 - Asian Philosophy 13 (2 & 3):145 – 164.
Independence as Relational Freedom.Alan M. S. J. Coffee - 2018 - In Sandrine Berges & Siani Alberto (eds.), Women Philosophers on Autonomy. London, UK: pp. 94-112.
Relational Professional Autonomy.Chris Macdonald - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (3):282-289.
The Psychology of Freedom.Raymond Van Over - 1974 - Fawcett Publications.
Relational Autonomy, Personhood, and African Traditions.Polycarp Ikuenobe - 2015 - Philosophy East and West 65 (4):1005-1029.
Nihilism and the Free Self.Simon May - 2009 - In Ken Gemes & Simon May (eds.), Nietzsche on Freedom and Autonomy. Oxford University Press. pp. 89.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-01-31

Total views
19 ( #564,657 of 2,455,360 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,290 of 2,455,360 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes