In Nils Holtug & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (eds.), Egalitarianism: New Essays on the Nature and Value of Equality. Oxford University Press (2006)
The difference principle, introduced by Rawls (1971, 1993), is generally interpreted as leximin, but this is not how he intended it. Rawls explicitly states that the difference principle requires that aggregate benefits (e.g., average or total) to those in the least advantaged group be given lexical priority over benefits to others, where the least advantaged group includes more than the strictly worst off individuals. We study the implications of adopting different approaches to the definition of the least advantaged group and show that, if acyclicity is required, several seemingly plausible approaches lead to something close to leximin. We then show that significant aggregation is possible, if the least advantaged group is defined as those with those with less benefits than some strictly positive transform of the lowest level of benefits. Finally, we discuss the implications of requiring that, in comparing two alternatives, the cutoff for the least advantaged group of one alternative be the same as that for the other alternative.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Equality, Priority and Global Justice.Nils Holtug - 2009 - Journal of Global Ethics 5 (3):173 – 179.
Need There Be a Defence of Equality? Winner of the 2010 Postgraduate Essay Prize.Christopher Nathan - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (3):211-225.
Similar books and articles
Trading with the Waiting-List: The Justice of Living Donor List Exchange.Govert den Hartogh - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (4):190-198.
Reiman's Libertarian Interpretation of Rawls' Difference Principle.Lawrence Alexander - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:13-18.
On the Possibility of Nonaggregative Priority for the Worst Off.Marc Fleurbaey, Bertil Tungodden & Peter Vallentyne - 2009 - Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (1):258-285.
Incentives and Principles for Individuals in Rawls’ Theory of Justice.Alex Voorhoeve - 2005 - Ethics and Economics 3 (1):1-7.
Egalitarianism: Is Leximin the Only Option?Bertil Tungodden - 2000 - Economics and Philosophy 16 (2):229-245.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads99 ( #49,800 of 2,153,830 )
Recent downloads (6 months)22 ( #16,986 of 2,153,830 )
How can I increase my downloads?