Are Design Beliefs Safe?

Studia Humana 8 (1):75-83 (2019)

Abstract

Recently, Del Ratzsch proposed a new version of the design argument. He argues that belief in a designer is often formed non-inferentially, much like perceptual beliefs, rather than formed by explicit reasoning. Ratzsch traces his argument back to Thomas Reid who argues that beliefs formed in this way are also justified. In this paper, I investigate whether design beliefs that are formed in this way can be regarded as knowledge. For this purpose, I look closer to recent scientific study of how design beliefs are formed. I argue that the science strongly suggest that people easily form false beliefs. As a result, design beliefs can only constitute knowledge if subjects have additional reasons or evidence for design.

Download options

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-20

Downloads
113 (#106,562)

6 months
10 (#73,903)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hans Van Eyghen
VU University Amsterdam

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moral Intuitionism Defeated?Nathan Ballantyne & Joshua C. Thurow - 2013 - American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (4):411-422.
Design Arguments Within a "Reidian" Epistemology.John T. Mullen - 2004 - Dissertation, University of Notre Dame
Cognitive Science Meets the Design Plan.M. van Elk - 2007 - South African Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):319-328.
Against global method safety.Sven Bernecker - 2020 - Synthese 197 (12):5101-5116.
Primitively Rational Belief-Forming Processes.Ralph Wedgwood - 2011 - In Andrew Reisner & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (eds.), Reasons for Belief. Cambridge University Press. pp. 180--200.
Six Levels of Mentality.Leslie Stevenson - 2002 - Philosophical Explorations 5 (2):105-124.
Disagreement, Design, and Thomas Reid.René van Woudenberg - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (S1):224-239.
Introspection, Mindreading, and the Transparency of Belief.Uwe Peters - 2018 - European Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):1086-1102.
Cleanthes’s Propensity and Intelligent Design.Liz Goodnick - 2011 - Modern Schoolman 88 (3/4):299-316.
Is Supernatural Belief Unreliably Formed?Hans Van Eyghen - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 85 (2):125-148.