Aesthetic Disinterestedness in Kant and Schopenhauer

Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 49 (1):45-70 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While several commentators agree that Schopenhauer’s theory of ‘will-less contemplation’ is a variant of Kant’s account of aesthetic disinterestedness, I shall argue here that Schopenhauer’s account departs from Kant’s in several important ways, and that he radically transforms Kant’s analysis of aesthetic judgement into a novel aesthetic attitude theory. In the first part of the article, I critically discuss Kant’s theory of disinterestedness, pay particular attention to rectifying a common misconception of this notion, and discuss some significant problems with Kant’s approach. In part two, I argue that Schopenhauer gives up Kant’s concern with the transcendental conditions of the reflecting judgement, but nonetheless retains two crucial aspects of Kant’s analysis: first, the idea that pure aesthetic pleasure cannot be based on the satisfaction of some personal desire or inclination and, second, that aesthetic experience is ultimately based on the stimulation of our cognitive powers. For Kant, too, suggests that, although our application of the predicate ‘beautiful’ be independent of the subsumption of the object under any determinate concept, it still leaves room for the imagination and the understanding to play ‘beyond’ what is regulated by determinate concepts. For Schopenhauer, aesthetic pleasure is equally the result of the cognitive freedom and expansion that the ‘will-less’ attitude affords. Schopenhauer thus transforms the Kantian transcendental analysis of beauty in terms of non-conceptual reflection’ into a psychological theory of beauty in terms of ‘non-conceptual cognition’. Hence, according to both Kant and Schopenhauer (or so I argue) a beautiful object yields a degree of harmony that cannot be reduced to the discursively rigid unity offered by conceptual knowledge. And, although Schopenhauer’s ‘idealistic’ version of aesthetic perception fails to accommodate for several valuable ways in which artworks can convey ideas, thoughts, and emotions, his account of aesthetic contemplation in terms of ‘will-lessness’ and objectivity is still rich in psychological insight

Other Versions

reprint Vandenabeele, Bart (2020) "Aesthetic Disinterestedness in Kant and Schopenhauer". Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 49(1):45

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,119

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant's aesthetics and the `empty cognitive stock'.Christopher Janaway - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (189):459-476.
Beauty and Aesthetic Properties: Taking Inspiration from Kant.Sonia Sedivy - 2019 - In Wolfgang Huemer & Íngrid Vendrell Ferran (eds.), Beauty: New Essays in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art. München, Deutschland: Philosophia. pp. 25 - 41.
Knowledge and Tranquility: Schopenhauer on the value of art.Christopher Janaway - 1996 - In Dale Jacquette (ed.), Schopenhauer, Philosophy and the Arts. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 39--61.
Kant's Aesthetic Theory: The Roles of Form and Expression.Kenneth F. Rogerson - 1981 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, and the Aesthetically Sublime.Bart Vandenabeele - 2003 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 37 (1):90.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-05-23

Downloads
75 (#229,831)

6 months
9 (#717,989)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bart Vandenabeele
University of Ghent

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references