A response to the mohist arguments in "impartial caring"
In Kim Chong Chong, Sor-Hoon Tan & C. L. Ten (eds.), The Moral Circle and the Self: Chinese and Western Approaches. Open Court (2003)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review: A Response to Card, Hoagland, Houston. [REVIEW]Nel Noddings - 1990 - Hypatia 5 (1):120 - 126.
More Mohist Marginalia: A Reply to Makeham on Later Mohist Canon and Explanation B 67.Chris Fraser - 2007 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy and Culture 2:227–59.
Is Fishkins’s Critique of Impartial Consequentialism Impartial?Michael H. Robins - 1985 - Tulane Studies in Philosophy 33:21-26.
Existentialist Voluntarism as a Source of Normativity.Andrew Jason Cohen - 2008 - Philosophical Papers 37 (1):89-129.
A Comment on Fry's "The Role of Caring in a Theory of Nursing Ethics".Jeannine Ross Boyer & James Lindemann Nelson - 1990 - Hypatia 5 (3):153-158.
When is Impartiality Morally Appropriate?Brad Hooker - 2010 - In Brian Feltham & John Cottingham (eds.), Partiality and Impartiality: Morality, Special Relationships, and the Wider World. Oxford University Press. pp. 26-41.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
220 (#57,699)
6 months
26 (#46,548)
2009-01-28
Downloads
220 (#57,699)
6 months
26 (#46,548)
Historical graph of downloads
