Cambridge University Press (2003)

Abstract
In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a theoretical tool for analyzing, evaluating and producing argumentative discourse. This is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy.
Keywords Persuasion   Pragmatics   Dialectic
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004, 2006, 2010
Buy this book $14.00 used (64% off)   $32.36 new (17% off)   $37.15 from Amazon (5% off)   Amazon page
ISBN(s) 0521830753   9780521830751   0521830753   052153772X   9780521537728   9780511162459   9780511616389
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,177
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 239 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-02

Total views
13 ( #766,259 of 2,499,680 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #139,330 of 2,499,680 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes