Between precautionary principle and “sound science”: Distributing the burdens of proof [Book Review]
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (1):103-122 (2002)
Opponents of biotechnology ofteninvoke the Precautionary Principle to advancetheir cause, whereas biotech enthusiasts preferto appeal to ``sound science.'' Publicauthorities are still groping for a usefuldefinition. A crucial issue in this debate isthe distribution of the burden of proof amongthe parties favoring and opposing certaintechnological developments. Indeed, the debateon the significance and scope of thePrecautionary Principle can be fruitfullyre-framed as a debate on the proper division ofburdens of proof. In this article, we attemptto arrive at a more refined way of thinkingabout this problem in order to escape from theexisting polarization of views between ``guiltyuntil proven innocent'' and ``innocent untilproven guilty.'' This way of thinking alsoenables a critical review of currentdemarcations between risk assessment and riskmanagement, or science and politics, and of themorally laden controversy on the relativeimportance of type-I and type-II errors instatistical testing.
|Keywords||biotechnology burden of proof Precautionary Principle type-I and type-II errors|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Prove It! The Burden of Proof Game in Science Vs. Pseudoscience Disputes.Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry - 2014 - Philosophia 42 (2):487-502.
Similar books and articles
Are the Precautionary Principle and the International Trade of Genetically Modified Organisms Reconcilable?Mariëlle Matthee & Dominique Vermersch - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (1):59-70.
Finding a Balance Over Precaution.Donald Bruce - 2002 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (1):7-16.
Formulating the Precautionary Principle.Neil A. Manson - 2002 - Environmental Ethics 24 (3):263-274.
How Not to Criticize the Precautionary Principle.Jonathan Hughes - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (5):447 – 464.
A Precautionary Approach to Genetically Modified Organisms: Challenges and Implications for Policy and Science. [REVIEW]Anne Ingeborg Myhr - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (6):501-525.
A Core Precautionary Principle.Stephen M. Gardiner - 2006 - Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (1):33–60.
"If You Don't Know How to Fix It, Please Stop Breaking It!" The Precautionary Principle and Climate Change.Philippe H. Martin - 1997 - Foundations of Science 2 (2):263-292.
The Precautionary Principle: Scientific Uncertainty and Type I and Type II Errors. [REVIEW]John Lemons, Kristin Shrader-Frechette & Carl Cranor - 1997 - Foundations of Science 2 (2):207-236.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #203,945 of 2,171,811 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,702 of 2,171,811 )
How can I increase my downloads?