‘Deep brain stimulation is no ON/OFF-switch’: an ethnography of clinical expertise in psychiatric practice

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 22 (1):129-148 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Despite technological innovations, clinical expertise remains the cornerstone of psychiatry. A clinical expert does not only have general textbook knowledge, but is sensitive to what is demanded for the individual patient in a particular situation. A method that can do justice to the subjective and situation-specific nature of clinical expertise is ethnography. Effective deep brain stimulation (DBS) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) involves an interpretive, evaluative process of optimizing stimulation parameters, which makes it an interesting case to study clinical expertise. The aim of this study is to explore the role of clinical expertise through an ethnography of the particular case of DBS optimization in OCD. In line with the topic of the special issue this article is a part of, we will also use our findings to reflect on ethnography as a method to study complex phenomena like clinical expertise. This ethnography of DBS optimization is based on 18 months of participant observation and nine in-depth interviews with a team of expert clinicians who have been treating over 80 OCD patients since 2005. By repeatedly observing particular situations for an extended period of time, we found that there are recurrent patterns in the ways clinicians interact with patients. These patterns of clinical practice shape the possibilities clinicians have for making sense of DBS-induced changes in patients’ lived experience and behavior. Collective established patterns of clinical practice are dynamic and change under the influence of individual learning experiences in particular situations, opening up new possibilities and challenges. We conclude that patterns of clinical practice and particular situations are mutually constitutive. Ethnography is ideally suited to bring this relation into view thanks to its broad temporal scope and focus on the life-world. Based on our findings, we argue that clinical expertise not only implies skillful engagement with a concrete situation but also with the patterns of clinical practice that shape what is possible in this specific situation. Given this constraining and enabling role of practices, it is important to investigate them in order to find ways to improve diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beneficence in general practice: an empirical investigation.W. A. Rogers - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (5):388-393.
The “Ethics” Expertise in Clinical Ethics Consultation.Ana S. Iltis & Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2016 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (4):363-368.
Debating Ethical Expertise.Norbert L. Steinkamp, Bert Gordijn & Henk A. M. J. ten Have - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (2):173-192.
Clinical judgement, expertise and skilled coping.Tim Thornton - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):284-291.
An empirical and philosophical exploration of clinical practice.Michael Saraga, Donald Boudreau & Abraham Fuks - 2019 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 14 (1):1-11.
An Ethics Expertise for Clinical Ethics Consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):649-661.
The relationship between clinical audit and ethics.S. Kinn - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (4):250-253.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-10

Downloads
19 (#753,814)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Erik Rietveld
University of Amsterdam