Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design

Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):407-433 (2013)
Abstract
The prospective robots in healthcare intended to be included within the conclave of the nurse-patient relationship—what I refer to as care robots—require rigorous ethical reflection to ensure their design and introduction do not impede the promotion of values and the dignity of patients at such a vulnerable and sensitive time in their lives. The ethical evaluation of care robots requires insight into the values at stake in the healthcare tradition. What’s more, given the stage of their development and lack of standards provided by the International Organization for Standardization to guide their development, ethics ought to be included into the design process of such robots. The manner in which this may be accomplished, as presented here, uses the blueprint of the Value-sensitive design approach as a means for creating a framework tailored to care contexts. Using care values as the foundational values to be integrated into a technology and using the elements in care, from the care ethics perspective, as the normative criteria, the resulting approach may be referred to as care centered value-sensitive design. The framework proposed here allows for the ethical evaluation of care robots both retrospectively and prospectively. By evaluating care robots in this way, we may ultimately ask what kind of care we, as a society, want to provide in the future
Keywords Value-sensitive design  Care robots  Care ethics  Ethics and technology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,478
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Creating Caring Institutions: Politics, Plurality, and Purpose.Joan Tronto - 2010 - Ethics and Social Welfare 4 (2):158-171.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Relational Autonomy as an Essential Component of Patient-Centered Care.Carolyn Ells, Matthew R. Hunt & Jane Chambers-Evans - 2011 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (2):79-101.
Care Ethics and Virtue Ethics.Raja Halwani - 2003 - Hypatia 18 (3):161-192.
The Role of Well‐Being.Joseph Raz - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):269–294.
Ethics for Health Care.Catherine Anne Berglund - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
The Importance of What They Care About.Matthew Noah Smith - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (2):297-314.
The Care Perspective and Autonomy.Marian A. Verkerk - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (3):289-294.
Added to PP index
2012-01-05

Total downloads
119 ( #41,877 of 2,180,551 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #29,341 of 2,180,551 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums