Journal of the History of Ideas 77 (2):253-282 (2016)

Authors
Abstract
This paper traces the ancestry of a familiar historiographical narrative, according to which early modern philosophy was marked by the development of empiricism, rationalism, and their synthesis by Immanuel Kant. It is often claimed that this narrative became standard in the nineteenth century, due to the influence of Thomas Reid, Kant and his disciples, or German Hegelians and British Idealists. The paper argues that the narrative became standard only at the turn of the twentieth century. This was not due to the influence of Reid, German Hegelians, or British Idealists as they did not endorse the narrative, although Thomas Hill Green may have facilitated its uptake. The narrative is based on Kant’s historiographical sketches, as corrected and integrated by Karl Leonhard Reinhold. It was first fleshed out into full-fledged histories by two Kantians, Wilhelm Gottlieb Tennemann and Johann Gottlieb Buhle. Numerous historians, several of whom were not Kantians, spread it in the English-speaking world. They include Kuno Fischer, Friedrich Ueberweg, Richard Falckenberg, and Wilhelm Windelband. However, the wide availability of their works did not suffice to make the narrative standard because, until the 1890s, the Hegelian account was at least as popular as theirs. Among the factors that allowed the narrative to become standard are its aptness to be adopted by philosophers of the most diverse persuasions, its simplicity and suitability for teaching.
Keywords British Idealism  Empiricism  Hegelianism  Histories of philosophy  Historiography  Kuno Fischer  Rationalism  Thomas Hill Green  Thomas Reid  Wilhelm Gottlieb Tennemann
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2016
DOI 10.1353/jhi.2016.0017
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Kant on Empiricism and Rationalism.Alberto Vanzo - 2013 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 30 (1):53-74.
Introduction.K. Green & R. Hagengruber - 2015 - The Monist 98 (1):1-6.
Hume.Richard H. Popkin - 1976 - Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):83-95.
The Idea of Early Modern Philosophy.Knud Haakonssen - 2004 - Teaching New Histories of Philosophy:99-121.
Did Hume Ever Read Berkeley?Richard H. Popkin - 1959 - Journal of Philosophy 56 (12):535-545.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Історико-філософська концепція петра кудрявцева: Європейський контекст.Liudmyla Pastushenko - 2018 - Наукові Записки Наукма. Філософія Та Релігієзнавство 1:55-64.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant on Empiricism and Rationalism.Alberto Vanzo - 2013 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 30 (1):53-74.
Between Chomskian Rationalism and Popperian Empiricism.Stephen P. Stich - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (December):329-47.
From Empirics to Empiricists.Alberto Vanzo - 2014 - Intellectual History Review 24 (4):517-538.
"New" New History: A Longue Durée Structure.Ignacio Olabarri - 1995 - History and Theory 34 (1):1-29.
Rationalism, Continental.Matthew Homan - 2014 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Reviews. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 1993 - European Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):343-360.
Tradition and Revolution in the Rhetoric of Analytic Philosophy.Matthew Sterenberg - 2010 - Philosophy and Literature 34 (1):pp. 161-172.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-06-16

Total views
1,155 ( #3,571 of 2,421,630 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
196 ( #2,526 of 2,421,630 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes