Exhaustivity in dynamic semantics; referential and descriptive pronouns

Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (5):621-657 (2001)
Abstract
In this paper I argue that anaphoric pronouns should always be interpreted exhaustively. I propose that pronouns are either used referentially and refer to the speaker's referents of their antecedent indefinites, or descriptively and go proxy for the description recoverable from its antecedent clause. I show how this view can be implemented within a dynamic semantics, and how it can account for various examples that seemed to be problematic for the view that for all unbound pronouns there always should be a notion of exhaustivity/uniqueness involved. The uniqueness assumption for the use of singular pronouns is also shown to be importantto explain what the discourse referents used in dynamic semantics represent.
Keywords Linguistics   Philosophy of Language   Artificial Intelligence   Computational Linguistics   Semantics   Syntax
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1017597801178
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,169
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Speaker's Reference and Anaphoric Pronouns.Karen S. Lewis - 2013 - Philosophical Perspectives 27 (1):404-437.
Truth and Reference in Context.Andrea Bonomi - 2006 - Journal of Semantics 23 (2):107-134.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
42 ( #126,778 of 2,191,855 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #288,547 of 2,191,855 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature