This paper reflects on the idea of ‘visualization’ of legal rules as part of an account of rule following in action. Presenting an alternative to Van Schooten’s (Jurisprudence and communication. Deborah Charles, Liverpool, 2012) account of interpretation, I first distinguish between two modes of interpretation: rehearsing and discursive. I argue that the former is the more basic one, relating to our respecting sources, rather than noticing signs, in action. In other (Wittgensteinian) words, we have to understand how we take guidance from rules. This account can profit from an analysis of what ‘seeing’ amounts to. Taking my cue from Merleau-Ponty, I point to the intertwinement between agent and world in seeing, in rule-following, and eventually in legal rule-following. The proof of the pudding is an alternative account of the time-honoured paradigm of legal interpretation: Hart’s ‘no vehicles in the park’. I show how this example is predicated on detecting ‘depth-clues’ in a rule, which allow an agent to correlate his vantage point to a vanishing point of a rule. The example illustrates a key-feature of rule following: reflexivity. I cannot follow a rule unless I project myself into its picture
Keywords Legal interpretation  Visualization  Rule-following  Reflexivity  Merleau-Ponty
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11196-013-9355-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,581
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Concept of Law.Hla Hart - 1961 - Oxford University Press.
Seeing Places. On Prepositions in Law.Bert Roermund - 1993 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 6 (3):249-270.
Le visible et l'invisible.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1964 - Paris, France: Gallimard.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Instrumental Rules and Motivation.Antony Hatzistavrou - 2006 - Legal Theory 12 (4):315-345.
Is the Rule of Recognition Really a Conventional Rule?Julie Dickson - 2007 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (3):373-402.
Promulgation and Derogation of Legal Rules.Pablo E. Navarro - 1993 - Law and Philosophy 12 (4):385 - 394.
Lon Fuller and the Moral Value of the Rule of Law.Colleen Murphy - 2004 - Law and Philosophy 24 (3):239-262.
Wittgenstein’s Paradox of Ordinary Language.Barry Stocker - 2000 - Essays in Philosophy 1 (2):1-14.
Positivism, Idealism and the Rule of Law.Sean Coyle - 2006 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (2):257-288.


Added to PP index

Total views
5 ( #1,182,567 of 2,461,673 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,599 of 2,461,673 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes