Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 48:75-76 (2008)
The recent developments in new media tools promise to improve our personal access to information management and our personalized abilities concerning i-communication. Rather than focusing on the practical implications of this evolution, I take a step back and address two underlying cultural phenomena in order to get a grip on the contemporary significance of ‘new media’. The first phenomenon (technotopia) concerns the place technology occupies in our psychological perception. ‘Technology’ is a concept on the move. In post-war culture, technology stands for industrialization and mechanization. It is often associated withan external power, like capitalism (consumerism), military force (WW II, Cold War warfare) or ideology (the race for space travel, biotechnoscience). In post-wall culture, technology increasingly stands for new media and digital user-oriented innovations. The threat or fascination with respect to an external authority is replaced by a democratization of technology. New media constantly remediates our relation to the world, hence becoming immanent and ubiquitous. The second phenomenon (Cybertribes) concerns the function of new media in our society. From an anthropological point of view, it is worthwhile to conceive new media as acontemporary ‘totem’ that structures communities. Unlike ‘myths’ or ‘gods’, ‘totems’ are ideological organization principles that are conceptually ambiguous, heterogeneous, open and incomplete. Hence, it can fulfill plurality of functions. For instance, it intensively shapes our daily interaction, it allows for aspiration and identification (cf. Cyborg-mania, avatars in Second Life). Moreover, it is a device to express and revolt (cf. Hacktivism, Etoy‐war, Marx 2.0)
|Keywords||Conference Proceedings Contemporary Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Skype and the Reality of Remedial Media.Paul Levinson - 2012 - Foundations of Science 17 (4):397-399.
Media Art.Robrecht Vanderbeeken - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 1:271-272.
Media Culture, Social Theory, and Cultural Studies 1996 Symposium on Media Culture – A Response.Douglas Kellner - unknown
Virtually Transcendent: Cyberculture and the Body.David J. Gunkel - 1998 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 13 (2):111 – 123.
The Media Role in Building the Disability Community.Jack A. Nelson - 2000 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 15 (3):180 – 193.
Love and Other Technologies: Retrofitting Eros for the Information Age.Dominic Pettman - 2006 - Fordham University Press.
Concerted Knowledges and Practices: An Experiment in Autonomous Cultural Production. [REVIEW]Xin Wei Sha - 2013 - AI and Society 28 (2):133-145.
Techno-Ethics: As a Matter of Fax.S. Shyam Sunder - 1991 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 6 (1):24 – 34.
Media Ethics on a Higher Order of Magnitude.Clifford G. Christians - 2008 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 23 (1):3 – 14.
Added to index2013-04-04
Total downloads9 ( #464,124 of 2,172,866 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #324,901 of 2,172,866 )
How can I increase my downloads?