Health Care Analysis 15 (3):179-193 (2007)

Over the past years, one of the most contentious topics in policy debates on genetics has been the use of genetic testing in insurance. In the rush to confront concerns about potential abuses of genetic information, most countries throughout Europe and the US have enacted genetics-specific legislation for insurance. Drawing on current debates on the pros and cons of a genetics-specific legislative approach, this article offers empirical insight into how such legislation works out in insurance practice. To this end, ethnographic fieldwork was done in the underwriting departments of Belgian insurance companies. Belgium was one of the first European countries introducing genetics-specific legislation in insurance. Although this approach does not allow us to speak in terms of ‘ the causal effects of the law’, it enables us to point to some developments in insurance practice that are quite different than the law’s original intentions. It will not only become clear that the Belgian genetics-specific legislation does not offer adequate solutions to the underlying issues it was intended for. We will also show that, while the legislation’s focus has been on the inadmissibility of genetic discrimination, at the same time differences are made in the insurance appraisal within the group of the asymptomatic ill. In other words, by giving exclusive legal protection to the group of genetic risks, other non-genetic risk groups are unintendedly being under-protected. From a policy point of view, studying genetics-specific legislation is especially valuable because it forces us to return to first principles: Which risks deserve our legal protection in insurance? Who do we declare our solidarity with?
Keywords Genetics  Insurance  Discrimination  Genetic privacy law  Solidarity  Health care
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10728-006-0041-5
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,110
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Social Theory and Social Structure.Lawrence Haworth - 1961 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11 (44):345-346.
The Faces of Injustice.Judith N. Shklar - 1991 - Law and Philosophy 10 (4):433-446.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Genetics and the British Insurance Industry.E. D. Cook - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):157-162.
The Forms and Limits of Insurance Solidarity.Turo-Kimmo Lehtonen & Jyri Liukko - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 103 (S1):33-44.
Genetic Testing and Insurance.Cormac Nagle - 2010 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 15 (4):9.


Added to PP index

Total views
16 ( #642,285 of 2,448,110 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #451,143 of 2,448,110 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes