Religious Studies 35 (1):37-55 (1999)

Abstract
In this paper I contribute to the ongoing debate on hell in three ways: (1) I distinguish between three questions that play a key role in any discussion of the doctrine of hell; (2) I argue positively for the need of a doctrine of hell for Christian theism; (3) after evaluating several theological positions, I argue that the doctrine of hell should be construed as intrinsically bound up with the Christian conviction that God is love and wants to live with human beings in a relationship of mutual love and fellowship. From this perspective on hell I provide some fresh criticisms on the positions of John Hick, Thomas Talbott, and Charles Seymour
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412598004697
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,768
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Universalism and the Problem of Hell.Ioanna-Maria Patsalidou - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (11):808-820.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Choosing Hell.Charles Seymour - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (3):249-266.
God's Goodness and God's Evil.James Kellenberger - 2005 - Religious Studies 41 (1):23-37.
Hell and Vagueness.Theodore Sider - 2002 - Faith and Philosophy 19 (1):58--68.
Hell and the Goodness of God.Wilko van Holten - 1999 - Religious Studies 35 (1):37 - 55.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
96 ( #115,724 of 2,462,953 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,363 of 2,462,953 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes