Identifying and ranking attributes that determine sustainability in Dutch dairy farming

Agriculture and Human Values 22 (1):53-63 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent developments in agriculture have stirred up interest in the concept of “sustainable” farming systems. Still it is difficult to determine the extent to which certain agricultural practices can be considered sustainable or not. Aiming at identifying the necessary attributes with respect to sustainability in Dutch dairy farming in the beginning of the third millennium, we first compiled a list of attributes referring to all farming activities with their related side effects with respect to economic, internal social, external social, and ecological sustainability. A wide range of people (i.e., experts and stakeholders) were consulted to contribute to our list of attributes. Our consultation showed that only one attribute was selected for economic and internal social sustainability: profitability and working conditions, respectively. The list for external social sustainability contained 19 attributes and the list for ecological sustainability contained 15 attributes. To assess their relative importance, the same experts and stakeholders ranked the attributes for external social and ecological sustainability by using a questionnaire. The most important attributes for external social sustainability were food safety, animal health, animal welfare, landscape quality, and cattle grazing. For ecological sustainability they were eutrophication, groundwater pollution, dehydration of the soil, acidification, and biodiversity. The present method for identifying and ranking attributes is universal and, therefore, can be used for other agricultural sectors, for other countries, and for other time periods.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Assessing the Construct Validity of the Global 100 Sustainability Ranking for Schools of Business.Gerald W. McLaughlin & Josetta S. McLaughlin - 2011 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:274-286.
The farm as clinic: veterinary expertise and the transformation of dairy farming, 1930–1950.Abigail Woods - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):462-487.
Sustainable agriculture is humane, humane agriculture is sustainable.Michael C. Appleby - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):293-303.
Managing cows: an ethnography of breeding practices and uses of reproductive technology in contemporary dairy farming in Lombardy (Italy).Cristina Grasseni - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):488-510.
Ranking Functions and Rankings on Languages.Franz Huber - 2006 - Artificial Intelligence 170 (4-5):462-471.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
36 (#385,000)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

The evolution of sustainability.Charles V. Kidd - 1992 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (1):1-26.
The varieties of sustainability.Paul B. Thompson - 1992 - Agriculture and Human Values 9 (3):11-19.
Caring for the Earth: A Strategy for Sustainable Living.[author unknown] - 1992 - Environmental Values 1 (2):171-173.
The meaning and ethics of sustainability.Richard Shearman - 1990 - Environmental Management 14 (1):1-8.

Add more references