Implicit bias: a sin of omission?

Philosophical Explorations 24 (3):325-336 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


It is widely believed that implicit bias is common and that it contributes, in part, to the perpetuation of systemic injustice. Hence, the existence of implicit bias raises the question: can individuals be blameworthy for their implicit bias? Here, I consider what it is about implicit bias that renders agents blameworthy. I defend the claim that, when individuals omit to engage in activities that could prevent the influence of implicit bias on their behavior, they may be blamed for their implicit bias. The plausibility of my proposal depends on whether individuals are able to engage freely in such activities and on whether there exists an obligation not to be biased (broadly put). I will answer positively to the former question and open the way for an answer to the latter, and tougher, question.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,385

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

46 (#340,729)

6 months
16 (#218,425)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marie van Loon
University of Zürich

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations