The U.S. Supreme Court recently held that a parody by the rap group 2 Live Crew of Ray Orbison's song "Oh, Pretty Woman" was "fair use" and thus did not infringe the copyright. Although the court insisted that it was not evaluating the quality of the parody, I argue that it does in fact make several aesthetic evaluations and sometimes even seems to praise the content of the parody. I ﬁrst consider the stated reasons for the claimed refusal of the court to evaluate aesthetic quality. Second, I examine the evaluations which the court in fact does make, at least some of which are clearly aesthetic evaluations. I then argue that aesthetic value judgments are both necessary and possible for determinations of "fair use" for such works as the "Pretty Woman" parody.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Justices: A Metaphysical Puzzle.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2004 - Noûs 38 (1):135–153.
The Constitutional Court's Decision in the Dispute Between the Supreme Court and the Judicial Commission: Banishing Judicial Accountability?Simon Butt - unknown
Schauer on Precedent in the U.S. Supreme Court.William A. Edmundson - 2007 - Georgia State University Law Review 24 (2):403-13.
A Capital Waste of Time? Examining the Supreme Court's 'Culture of Death'.Douglas A. Berman - manuscript
The United State Supreme Court and Health Law: The Year in Review: The Supreme Court Federalizes Managed Care Liability.Theodore W. Ruger - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 32 (3):528-531.
The Michigan Supreme Court Diminishes the Right to Trial by Jury in Civil Cases.Robert A. Sedler - manuscript
Private International Law Before the United States Supreme Court: Recent Terms in Review.Charles T. Kotuby Jr - manuscript
An Empirical Analysis of Supreme Court Certiorari Petition Procedures: The Call for Response and the Call for the Views of the Solicitor General.David C. Thompson & Melanie Wachtell - unknown
An Ethical Evaluation of the Supreme Court Decision Regarding ERISA Interpretation.Kristin Lefebvre - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):327-334.
Addressing Judicial Activism in the Indian Supreme Court: Towards an Evolved Debate.Madhav Khosla - unknown
Explaining the Tension Between the Supreme Court's Embrace of Validity as the Touchstone of Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Lower Courts' (Seeming) Rejection of Same.Michael J. Saks - 2008 - Episteme 5 (3):pp. 329-342.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads14 ( #329,858 of 2,158,887 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,157 of 2,158,887 )
How can I increase my downloads?