Kant and Husserl on bringing perception to judgment

Corijn Van Mazijk
University of Groningen
There is today much debate about the contents of perceptual experience relative to our capacity to make them figure in judgments. There is considerably less interest, however, in how we subsume perceptual contents in judgments, that is, what judging about a perception is like for us. For Kant and Husserl, this second question is as important as the first. Whereas Kant tries to answer it in the schematism section of the first Critique, Husserl addresses it at length in Experience and Judgment. This paper draws new attention to this ‘forgotten’ transcendental problem by comparing both accounts of it. I will first discuss Kantian conceptualism in section two and schematization in section three. In section four I then turn to the Husserlian notion of type, which is today often juxtaposed to Kant’s schema. After rejecting one commonly held view that they are functionally identical, I turn to Husserl’s work on active synthesis, where I distinguish three different acts of judgment and their respective contents.
Keywords Husserl   Kant   perception   judgment   knowledge   schematism   passive synthesis   conceptual content
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,955
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant and Husserl on the Contents of Perception.Corijn van Mazijk - 2016 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 54 (2):267-287.
Kantian Themes in Merleau-Ponty’s Theory of Perception.Samantha Matherne - 2016 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 98 (2):193-230.
Ist Eine Synthesis a Priori Noch Möglich? Zur Heutigen Bedeutung der Lehren Kants Und Husserls von der Transzendentalen Synthesis.Andrei Patkul - 2016 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 8 (2):371-395.
Kant and the Art of Schematism.Samantha Matherne - 2014 - Kantian Review 19 (2):181-205.
Two Idealisms: Lask and Husserl.Karl Schuhmann & Barry Smith - 1993 - Kant-Studien 84 (4):448-466.
Husserl and McDowell on the Role of Concepts in Perception.Maxime Doyon - 2011 - New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 11:42-74.
Was Kant a Nonconceptualist?Hannah Ginsborg - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (1):65 - 77.
On Some Philosophical Accounts of Perception.George S. Pappas - 2003 - In Journal of Philosophical Research. Charlottesville: Philosophy Documentation Center. pp. 71-82.
Kant's Concept of Force.Melissa Zinkin - 1999 - Dissertation, Northwestern University


Added to PP index

Total views
2 ( #1,110,766 of 2,319,369 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #592,230 of 2,319,369 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature