In James Maclaurin (ed.), Rationis Defensor. Springer. pp. 75-96 (2012)

Authors
Abstract
This paper discusses Immanuel Kant’s views on the role of experiments in natural science, focusing on their relationship with hypotheses, laws of nature, and the heuristic principles of scientific enquiry. Kant’s views are contrasted with the philosophy of experiment that was first sketched by Francis Bacon and later developed by Robert Boyle and Robert Hooke. Kant holds that experiments are always designed and carried out in the light of hypotheses. Hypotheses are derived from experience on the basis of a set of heuristic principles. The function of experiments is testing hypotheses in order to either reject them as false, or else to transform them into empirical laws of nature. To this end, we must integrate the hypotheses that are confirmed by experiments with the a priori principles which are the foundations of natural science. Compared with Bacon, Boyle, and Hooke, Kant has elaborate views on the one hand, on how our theoretical and pre-theoretical assumptions bear on experimental practice, and on the other hand, on how the results of experimental activity can be integrated with theories to advance our knowledge of nature. However, Kant overstates the dependence of experiments on theories.
Keywords Kant  Experimental Philosophy  Hypotheses  Laws of Nature  Bacon  Boyle  Hooke  experiment
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Rethinking Kant's Fact of Reason.Owen Ware - 2014 - Philosophers' Imprint 14.
Rehabilitating the Regulative Use of Reason: Kant on Empirical and Chemical Laws.Michael Bennett McNulty - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:1-10.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Robert Boyle's Epistemology: The Interaction Between Scientific and Religious Knowledge.J. J. MacIntosh - 1992 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (2):91 – 121.
Nomological and Transcendental Criteria for Scientific Laws.Predrag Šustar - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):533-544.
Robert Boyle and the Heuristic Value of Mechanism.R. P. - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):157-170.
Kant’s Proof of the Law of Inertia.Kenneth Westphal - 1995 - In H. Robinson (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Kant Congress. Marquette University Press. pp. 413-424.
Rethinking Thought Experiments.Alisa Bokulich - 2001 - Perspectives on Science 9 (3):285-307.
The Unity of Reason: Rereading Kant.Susan Neiman - 1994 - Oxford University Press.
God and the Laws of Nature.Robin Collins - 2009 - Philo 12 (2):142-171.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-06-11

Total views
117 ( #76,939 of 2,331,168 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #30,992 of 2,331,168 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes