Kant on Empiricism and Rationalism

History of Philosophy Quarterly 30 (1):53-74 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Several scholars have criticized the histories of early modern philosophy based on the dichotomy of empiricism and rationalism. They view them as overestimating the importance of epistemological issues for early modern philosophers (epistemological bias), portraying Kant's Critical philosophy as a superior alternative to empiricism and rationalism (Kantian bias), and forcing most or all early modern thinkers prior to Kant into the empiricist or rationalist camps (classificatory bias). Kant is often said to be the source of the three biases. Against this criticism, this paper argues that Kant did not have the three biases. However, he promoted a way of writing histories of philosophy from which those biases would naturally flow.

Similar books and articles

Experimental philosophy and the origins of empiricism.Peter R. Anstey & Alberto Vanzo - 2023 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Alberto Vanzo.
From Empirics to Empiricists.Alberto Vanzo - 2014 - Intellectual History Review 24 (4):517-538.
Early Modern Critiques of Rationalist Psychology.Antonia LoLordo - 2005 - In Alan Jean Nelson (ed.), A Companion to Rationalism. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 119–135.
Early modern empiricism.Silvia Manzo & Sofía Calvente - 2020 - Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences.
Really Good Noodles: Empiricism, Rationalism, Immanuel Kant, and the Matrix.James M. Lawler - 2018 - Philosophia: International Journal of Philosophy (Philippine e-journal) 19 (1):95-106.
Rewriting the A Priori/A Posteriori Distinction.Peter Murphy - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Research 33:279-284.


Added to PP

162 (#24,864)

6 months
1,857 (#5,342)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile