Kant's Regulative Principle of Aesthetic Excellence: The Ideal Aesthetic Experience

Kant-Studien 86 (3):331-345 (1995)
It is rather intriguing that we will often try to persuade people of what we find beautiful, even though we do not believe that they may subsequently base their judgement of taste on our testimony. Typically, we think that the experience of beauty is such that we cannot leave it to others to be had. Moreover, we are often aware of the contingency of our own judgements’ foundation in our own experience. Nevertheless, we do think that certain aesthetic, evaluative conceptions do relate to specific experiences in a non-trivial way, especially that of aesthetic excellence. Now certain analytical aestheticians ascribe truth values to aesthetic judgements of various kinds. Such ascription would evidently have a bearing on the problem of aesthetic experience’s relevance for evaluation, as we may in the end be better off neglecting the experiential altogether in virtue of treating aesthetic values in objectivist ways, as natural properties, or as reducible to such properties, descriptions of which will then indeed be true or false.1 However, I think that it is too early yet to bury subjectivism. So let us instead defend it and try to get a better grasp on its suppositions. In this we may profit from ideas advanced by David Wiggins, who neither denies the role played by objective properties, nor neglects the subjective import. According to him, aesthetic values are somehow kinds of relations, which are established by an elaborate process of criticism and refinement of perceptions of, and feelings toward specific natural properties.2 The argument in this paper suggests that the analysis of a paradigmatic pair regarding ‘aesthetic excellence’ provides us with inter-
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/kant.1995.86.3.331
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,470
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
James O. Young (2009). Relativism, Standards and Aesthetic Judgements. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2):221 – 231.
Anthony Graybosch (2002). American Beauty. Acta Analytica 17 (1):133-150.
Nick Zangwill (2005). Aesthetic Realism 1. In Jerrold Levinson (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Haewan Lee (2008). Characterizing Aesthetic Experience. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 1:161-167.
Brit Strandhagen (2007). Disconnecting Reality. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 12:31-35.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

40 ( #120,932 of 1,925,556 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #187,179 of 1,925,556 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.