Kant, Skepticism, and the Comparison Argument

In Pablo Muchnick (ed.), Rethinking Kant, vol. 2. Cambridge Scholars Publishers (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kant's writings on logic illustrate the comparison argument about truth, which goes as follows. A truth-bearer p is true if and only if it corresponds, or it agrees, with a portion of reality: the object(s), state(s) of affairs, or event(s) p is about. In order to know whether p agrees with that portion of reality, one must check if that portion of reality is as p states. Using the terms of the comparison argument, one must compare p with that portion of reality. This is impossible, because the only knowledge of reality we can have is in the form propositions, beliefs, or judgments, whose agreement with reality is as much in need of justification as the agreement of p with reality. Therefore, it is impossible to know which truth-bearers are true. This paper reconstructs Kant's version of the comparison argument. It is argued that, according to Kant, the argument is sound only under the assumption of transcendental realism. Transcendental idealism avoids the sceptical consequences of the comparison argument.

Similar books and articles

Kant's argument for transcendental idealism in the transcendental aesthetic.Lucy Allais - 2010 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (1pt1):47-75.
Kant on the Nominal Definition of Truth.Alberto Vanzo - 2010 - Kant Studien 101 (2):147-166.
Kant's transcendental idealism and contemporary anti‐realism.Lucy Allais - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (4):369 – 392.
God, Possibility, and Kant.Robert Merrihew Adams - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (4):425-440.
Kant on Truth-Aptness.Alberto Vanzo - 2012 - History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (2):109-126.
Truth criteria and the very project of a transcendental logic.Timothy Rosenkoetter - 2009 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91 (2):193-236.
Kant’s Refutation of Anti-Realism.Edward Blatnik - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Research 19:127-146.
The Ontological Argument Revisited: A Reply to Rowe.Eric Wilson - 2010 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 15 (1):37 - 44.
A new argument for skepticism.Baron Reed - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (1):91 - 104.
Kant's Transcendental Deduction and the Ghosts of Descartes and Hume.Corey W. Dyck - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (3):473-496.
Objects of Representation.Leslie Stevenson - 2011 - Diametros 27:4-24.
The Ontological Argument Reconsidered.Oded Balaban & Asnat Avshalom - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Research 15:279-310.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-10-25

Downloads
396 (#28,732)

6 months
26 (#46,270)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.George Berkeley & Colin M. Turbayne - 1907 - Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Kant on the Nominal Definition of Truth.Alberto Vanzo - 2010 - Kant Studien 101 (2):147-166.
On the Textual Authenticity of Kant's Logic.Terry Boswell - 1988 - History and Philosophy of Logic 9 (2):193-203.
Teorie Della Verità.Giorgio Volpe - 2005 - Guerini Scientifica.

View all 12 references / Add more references