Leibniz on Innate Ideas and Kant on the Origin of the Categories

Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 100 (1):19-45 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his essay against Eberhard, Kant denies that there are innate concepts. Several scholars take Kant’s statement at face value. They claim that Kant did not endorse concept innatism, that the categories are not innate concepts, and that Kant’s views on innateness are significantly different from Leibniz’s. This paper takes issue with those claims. It argues that Kant’s views on the origin of the intellectual concepts are remarkably similar to Leibniz’s. Given two widespread notions of innateness, the dispositional notion and the input/output notion, intellectual concepts are innate for Kant no less than for Leibniz.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Epigenesis of Pure Reason and the Source of Pure Cognitions.Huaping Lu-Adler - 2018 - In Pablo Muchnik & Oliver Thorndike, Rethinking Kant Vol.5. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp. 35-70.
Kant e la formazione dei concetti.Alberto Vanzo - 2012 - Trento (Italy): Verifiche.
Kant’s Theory of Concept Formation and his Theory of Definitions.Matthew McAndrew - 2023 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 105 (4):591-619.
Finite minds and their representations in Leibniz and Kant.Anja Jauernig - 2019 - Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus / International Yearbook of German Idealism 14:47-80.
Pure Understanding, the Categories, and Kant's Critique of Wolff.Brian A. Chance - 2018 - In Kate A. Moran, Kant on Freedom and Spontaneity. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-28

Downloads
3,802 (#2,529)

6 months
440 (#4,536)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?